How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny

How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? What do you think totalitarianism means? When we think of tyranny, we consider its harsh absolute provide in the hands of whizz individual, like King George Ill. In James Madisons argument for his support of the Constitution he wrote that The accumulation of every last(predicate) power in the aforesaid(prenominal) hands, whether of one and only(a), a few, or mevery is the very definition of tyranny. In 1787, the framers came together in Philadelphia to write the Constitution to help guard against tyranny.The Constitution guarded gainst tyranny in several ways which were federalism, separation of power, checks and balances, and big invokes versus down(p) states. The beginning(a) guard against tyranny was federalism which means the federal principle of g everywherenment. In the Federalist Paper 51 James Madison wrote that In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided in the midst of d euce distinct governments, and the portion lot to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments. (Doc. A). Madisons idea was known as Federalism, the division of ower between commutation and state governments.Federalism provides a double security to the people by the arise of the peoples rights. Central and state governments have shared and separate powers. For instant, both governments set up courts and pass laws. Powers given to the Central Government were regulate trade, declaring war, scenery up post offices, and making immigration laws. Powers given to the states were holding elections, setting up local governments, passing marriages and divorce laws, and establishing schools. Federalism protects against yranny because both governments were meet and gave people a say in the government.A second guard against tyranny was separation of power which means the government divided into three carve upes. They separated the government into the executive distinguish, legis lative branch, and Judicial branch. In the Federalist Paper 47 James Madison said The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the identical hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may be Just marked the very definition of yranny (Doc B). The idea Madison advocated with this quote was that through the separation of powers there tyranny shouldnt form.The Job of each branch is to protect the rights of the people. The separation of powers protects against tyranny because one branch spatenot do something without the consultancy of another branch. This provided equal powers between the three branches. The third guard against tyranny was checks and balances which means a balance in power. As indicated in the chart, document C, the legislative branch or congress has check over he executive and Judicial branch it support override the vote of the executive branch and approve of presidential nominations. Wi th the Judicial branch it could impeach judges and remove them from office.They could also do the same with the President and remove him or her from office. The executive branch could appoint Judges to the Supreme Court and can veto Congressional legislation. The Judicial branch can declare laws un intact and declare presidential acts as unconstitutional. James Madison said that (The three branches) should not be so far separated as to ave no constitutional control over each other, meaning that without check and balances it would be one step closer to a tyranny, because one of the branches could gain all the control of the power (Doc C).In that the fght over how the states should be stand for in congress began. The fourth and final step the delegates implied was the arguments between the small and big states and how they should be represented in congress. In the Constitutional Convention there was a big fuss over how the states should be represented, so that the big states votes o r uggestions wouldnt override the votes or suggestions of the smaller states. They came to the agreement known as the Great Compromise.In the compromise the agreed that under the House of Representatives the states would be represented by population (Doc. D). This made the large states happier because they would have more representation over the smaller states. They also agreed to that the Senate of the United States shall be composed of two senators per state, making the smaller states happier because of the equal representation. With the compromise the states ould become united and this would help guard against tyranny.In the Constitutional Convention the delegates and Madison used arguments of federalism through the division of powers, checks and balances and the arguments between the larger and smaller states to guard against tyranny. Although checks and balances and the arguments between are important reason to prevent tyranny, the most important reason for the prevent of tyra nny is the separation of powers, through the separation of powers the delegates insecurity of our rights. Therefore preventing one group gaining control of all powers.How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny?Tyranny is a malicious enemy, it leases over and, will make you go against your will. The Articles Of Confederation was the first step the American Colonists took to get rid tyranny, but that dramatically failed. The Articles Of Confederation was missing many key parts such as a central government, there was no president, and the wasnt even a court system. Also it didnt justify a currency for the whole country.When you went to other states, they all had diametrical currencies, so it was almost impossible to buy things, because people didnt know how much one currency was worth compared to the other. Another problem the Articles Of Confederation didnt cover was that there was no way for the central government to force states to pay their taxes. This was a problem because i f states didnt pay their taxes, the states would be a autocrat over the federal government. American Colonists decided that they require a new constitution if they didnt want the country to fall apart.The framers of the constitution defend us from the terrible evil of tyranny using four methods, which were, Federalism, dividing the government into three branches, a system of checks and balances, and preventing large states from creating a tyranny over the small states. account A shows that the first step the framer took to protect us from tyranny was using a form of government called Federalism. Madisons idea of division of power between central and state governments is known as federalism. (Doc A) From the chart in Document A, you can clearly see that this prevents any tyranny from hazard.Powers that are needed to run a country are given to the federal government such as Declaring war, coining money, and conducting foreign relations. (Doc A) Also powers that are needed for a st ate are given, such as holding elections, and regulating in-state business. (Doc A) Powers that are needed by both states, and the federal law are shared. This prevents any tyranny from happening because the states cant take control of federal powers, and the federal government cant take control of state powers. They can only take the power shared and the powers they own.The second step the framers took to protect us from tyranny was divide the central government into three branches. The section taken from the constitution its self shows the three branches of government. James Madison said, the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, wether of one, a few, or many, and wether hereditary, self-appointed, or elected, may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny. (Doc B) The constitution clearly doesnt put the powers of legislative, executive, and judiciary in one, or many hands.All the branches have split powers. The Legislative branch can only have the powers of congress. (Doc B) The Executive branch has powers vested within the president. (Doc B) Lastly, the Judicial branch has its powers vested in the highest court of the nation, the Supreme Court. As you can see the constitution prevents any branch to gain any more power from other branches. You may ask, wasnt Germany a democracy before Hitler took over? Yes it was, but the next split explains how the constitution prevented any other branch from taking over powers of another branch.The framers of the constitution created an ingenious way to prevent tyranny of one branch over other branches, with a system of checks and balances. James Madison said, the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other. (Doc C) The diagram shows the branches have checks on each other. If the president tries to take the power of another branch, than the legislative branch can impeach the president. (Doc C) This is one of the checks of the legislative branch on the Executive branch.Each branch has a check of every other branch, so if one branch is doing something wrong, another branch can check the wronged branch, and fix the problem. This probably answers your question on how another branch cant take control. iodine of the last things the framer of the constitution did to make sure no tyrant would arise, was to make sure the smaller states got a fair vote in congress. In the constitutional convention, two plans were proposed called the Virginia plan, and the New Jersey plan. The Virginia plan was favored large states, and was based of population.The New jersey plan favored small states, and gave each state an equal amount of votes. Eventually they came up of something called the great compromise, and they proposed that congress would be composed of the senate, and The House Of Representatives. The House Of Representatives is based of population, which provides fairness to large stat es. (Doc D) On the other hand, the Senate has two representatives from each state, which provides fairness to smaller states. (Doc D) Undoubtedly, this provides fairness among both large, and small states, ultimately taking a closer step to rid of tyranny.To sum it up, the framers of the constitution protected us from the terrible evil of tyranny using the four methods, Federalism, dividing the government into three branches, a system of checks and balances, and preventing large states from creating a tyranny over the small states in congress. James Madison said, the accumulation of powers in the same hands, wether of one, a few, or many, is the very definition of tyranny , and the constitution does a good hypothesize of preventing that. The framers succeeded in creating a well built constitution because all four methods have created security that no tyrant, or tyranny would arise.